Peer evaluation form research paper

Some of the ICs publish paylines as part of their funding strategies to guide applicants on their likelihood of receiving funding.  Application scores can only be compared against the payline for the fiscal year when the application will be considered for funding, which is not necessarily the year when it was submitted.  There may be a delay of several months to determine paylines at the beginning of fiscal years.   If the application is assigned to an IC that does not announce a payline, the program official listed at the top of the summary statement may be able to provide guidance on the likelihood of funding. After the Advisory Council meeting, if an application results in an award, the applicant will be working closely with the program official of the funding Institute or Center on scientific and programmatic matters and a Grants Management Officer on budgetary or administrative issues. The Grants Management Specialist will contact the applicant to collect information needed to prepare the award. 
   
How to Volunteer to Be a Reviewer
For those interested in volunteering on NIH review panels, please see:

Peer evaluation form research paper

peer evaluation form research paper

Media:

peer evaluation form research paperpeer evaluation form research paperpeer evaluation form research paperpeer evaluation form research paper